A complete five-step assurance lifecycle — a risk-based annual plan, fieldwork with workpapers and review, findings tracked through to closure.
The engagement list follows habit and available resources, which is hard to justify to the audit committee.
Files sit on a shared drive. It is unclear which review notes are still open, who closed them and on what basis.
Once the report is issued, that is the end of it. The next cycle reveals the corrective action was never done.
The chief audit executive only learns progress by asking each team lead, usually too late to intervene.
Two representative screens illustrating the product interface. The figures shown are sample data.
High-risk coverage, annual plan progress and the list of stalled engagements with the specific reason for each.
Team leads open review notes on each workpaper; an engagement cannot move to conclusion while any note is open.
| Who it fits | When to use it | Data to prepare |
|---|---|---|
| Internal audit functions of three people or more | When files need standardising before a quality assessment | The current annual audit plan |
| Listed companies or organisations with an audit committee | When the committee requires periodic reports with consistent figures | Org structure and process catalogue |
| Organisations adopting GIAS 2024 | When moving from paper files and shared drives to a system | The list of identified controls and risks |
This module runs on its own. Once linking is on, all three share the risk register, control library and evidence store — see the platform architecture diagram.
RiskTech supports organisations operating to the standards below. This is not a certification claim for the software or for the organisations using it.
A 30-minute demo following the role you hold. No data preparation needed beforehand. We respond within one business day.
